You Have Challenges. We Have Solutions!
Pengo is excited to introduce the TriDent® series of holders and teeth. The patented TriDent® holders are designed
to work with three different types of teeth: the Strata Conical Tooth, a Non-rotating Radial Tooth and a Non-Rotating
Wedge Tooth.
1, 3, 7 – It’s that easy! One holder coupled with three types of teeth provide drillers seven different soil conditions to
drill in. Whether it is gravel, fracturable rock or non-fracturable rock, the TriDent® teeth provide maximum performance
over standard teeth.
The most versatile teeth and holders on the market. One holder, three teeth, seven drilling conditions.
INTERNATIONAL EQUIPMENT SOLUTIONS
INTERNATIONAL EQUIPMENT SOLUTIONS
Add the proper IES logo and tag to any of the
websites, literature, collateral material, PowerPoint
templates and trade show graphics where you had
the Dover logo in the past.
Link any electronic uses of the IES logo and tag to
the IES website: www.iesholdings.com.
Use the logo and the tag for any website or
electronic applications.
IES COLOR SPECIFICATIONS
www.pengoattachments.com
pengosales@pengoattachments.com
Phone: 800.599.0211
Fax: 800.915.6904
Copyright Pengo Corporation 2017
Holder Available in 0.87", 1",
and 1.18" Shank Sizes Teeth
Drilling Conditions
U.S. Patent number: D778,967
dirt sand silt clay gravel fracturaable
rock
non-fracturable
rock
Implied consent
“Implied consent” can be shown to
exist in certain situations, including:
• The recipient has made a purchase
or lease of goods, services and land
or interest in land from the sender
within the two-year period immediately
prior to the date the CEM is sent
• The recipient has made an inquiry
or application to the sender on any
of the items above within the sixmonth
period immediately prior to
the date the CEM is sent
• The recipient has entered into a written
contract with the sender that is
still in existence or expired within the
two-year period immediately prior to
the date the CEM is sent.
While implied consent can be helpful,
tracking the implied consent – and
connecting it to individual CEMs – is
practically very difficult.
Express consent
Given the above, many businesses – in
addition to ensuring that any CEMs
contain the required contact information
and an appropriate unsubscribe
mechanism – have diligently worked
to ensure that they have clear, opt-in,
express consent to send any CEMs.
The reason is simple: such express
consent removes the need of proving
that a specific CEM fit within any of
the above exceptions.
Of course, any consent, whether it
is implied or explicit, can be revoked
at any time via the unsubscribe
mechanism.
The need for a database
Given the complexities of CASL, most
businesses have to create extensive
databases which track the basis for
consent and, furthermore, monitor
and track the sending of CEMs and
any unsubscribe requests. It must be
remembered that the onus rests on
the business to prove that an individual
CEM complied with the provisions
of CASL.
Revisit CASL compliance
As can be seen, the provisions of CASL
have created extensive compliance
costs that appear to only be increasing.
Businesses would be well advised
to regularly review their CASL compliance
in an effort to limit the literal
damages that can result.
Paul K. Grower is a partner with Fillmore
Riley LLP who practises primarily in
the areas of taxation litigation, privacy
law and general commercial litigation.
You can reach him at (204) 957 8369 or
pgrower@fillmoreriley.com
This article provides a brief summary
of CASL. Specific questions about its
applicability in any specific situation
should be discussed with your lawyer.
LEGAL
PILING CANADA 79
/www.iesholdings.com
/www.pengoattachments.com
link
link
/www.iesholdings.com
/www.pengoattachments.com
link
link
